←

Diary of a (Maybe) Retired Pastor

Tag: Moral order

  • Not A Matter Of Right And Wrong

    mayberetiredpastor

    Not A Matter Of Right And Wrong

    12 the night is far gone, the day is near. Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armour of light; 13 let us live honourably as in the day, not in revelling and drunkenness, not in debauchery and licentiousness, not in quarrelling and jealousy. 14 Instead, put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.

    Romans 13:12-14, New Testament, The Bible.

    Off the cuff remarks can be dangerous. We inadvertently say things we would never dream of saying in a more considered manner. These “Freudian slips” can also reveal deep, unsettling truths about ourselves or about our view of the world. Last week, the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, made an off the cuff remark in response to a reporter’s question. He said  that “it is no longer a matter of right and wrong”. I confess that I have forgotten whether the context was the uproar concerning the so-called “loop-hole” exploited by a Palestinian family to gain entry to the UK or the aftermath of the White House ambush of President Zelensky.  But, the remark stands out as a deeply revealing comment about the state of our world at the present time. Right and wrong no longer have any role in the international relationships of our world. President Trump’s State of the Union address made clear what matters: “America will be rich again!” was his triumphant cry which was greeted with huge applause and cheering from the majority benches.  

    So many biblical texts spring to mind in response to such a declaration (the parable of the rich fool Luke, 12:13-21; serving God and Mammon, Matthew 6:24; the root of all evil, 1 Timothy 6:10, to name but three) that it seems unnecessary to state how unbiblical and anti-Christian such a world is. Except that so many apparently professing Christians appear to be in complete agreement with such sentiment. The world is in a very dark place.

    Last time, I wrote that Christians need to speak the light of truth in the darkness, so, the Palestinian family did not exploit a loophole but followed Home Office procedure to the letter and fully within the law (1); President Zelensky is not a dictator and did not start the war.   But truth is more than words. It is also about how we live our lives. Our daily acts that demonstrate who we are following and which reveal the light of a different Kingdom ruled by different laws: not bowing to Mammon, the god of wealth; welcoming the outcast and stranger; treating others as we would want to be treated; receiving and giving grace; serving one another and not grasping for ourselves.

    It is the season of Lent, the period of fasting in the church calendar before the celebration of Easter. The true fast that God desires is the breaking of injustice, the releasing of the oppressed, the breaking of every bondage, the sharing with the poor and hungry,  homing the homeless and clothing the naked (Isaiah 58:6-7). Every small act that contributes to these pushes back against the darkness that is enfolding us.

    1. https://www.declassifieduk.org/rights-and-wrongs-over-gaza-judgment-exposes-starmer/

  • Interesting Times

    mayberetiredpastor

    Interesting Times

    20 “If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive. But for the sake of the elect, whom he has chosen, he has shortened them. 21 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘Look, there he is!’ do not believe it. 22 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.

    Mark 13:20-22, The New Testament

    We, unfortunately, live in interesting times as the apocryphal Chinese curse goes (1). For all their appeal to a mythical  “Great Britain” that used to be, the far right of contemporary politics is steadily eroding the ethical and moral underpinnings of the post-World War II  consensus that never again should the horrors of Belsen and Auschwitz, and the ideologies and policies leading to them, be seen. Out of that conviction the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, closely followed by the European Declaration of Human Rights, was born. Giving effect to these declarations the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) were established. But we see senior Conservative politicians openly campaigning to repudiate the ECHR so that we can treat desperate migrants in any way we wish, unconstrained by the very laws that Britain itself helped to establish after the war. The cry is that we as a nation should be able to determine what is right and what is wrong without interference by an outside body (the irony is completely lost on the Far Right!). Two generations on from those who marched in horror into Belsen this generation of politicians has forgotten that countries can go badly wrong and bodies such as the ECHR were established to prevent that from happening.

    This drifting away from the ethical and moral anchors of the post-War years is no more clearly illustrated than by the decision of the Prime Minister to absent himself from the main D-Day Landings event for world leaders.  I feel sure it wasn’t deliberately intended as a signal that Britain was now distancing itself from those anchors, but it demonstrates the relative importance in his mind, and of the advisors around him, of that post-War consensus.

    Why does this matter? If one of the major architects of the post-War consensus is seen to be now walking away from that consensus and detaching itself from the moral and ethical anchors of that consensus then others will feel able to do the same. The result is that Putin felt able to invade Ukraine and once again wage war on European soil after decades of peace. It means that Israel has been able to inflict huge suffering on civilians in Gaza with impunity in its pursuit of the destruction of Hamas. It means that the moral force of the EHCR and the ICC is necessarily weakened. Nations and their governments feel free to behave as they please without accountability of any kind.

    It is the greatest irony that the nation that had a central role in overturning the worldwide norm that slavery was simply a regrettable fact of life, and which was a major architect of the system that holds governments and nations to account for their actions  should be turning its back on the latter. These two are the diamonds in the history of Britain that could justify the epithet “Great” as the politicians of the right like to use it, and yet they are seeking to consign at least one of them to the rubbish heap of history!

    Britain has not yet broken entirely with the consensus it helped to establish after the Second World War, but one wonders if, after this General Election, the new government will seek to repair Britain’s commitment to that consensus or whether the rot which has set-in under the outgoing Conservative government will be allowed to continue. Will we hold to the ethical and moral anchors of the post-War years or will we yield to the Siren calls of those who would unleash our baser instincts?

    1. The supposed Chinese curse “may you live in interesting times” appears to have no basis in fact, or, at least, there is no record of such a curse that has been found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_you_live_in_interesting_times acc. 27 Jun 2024 16:04