←

Diary of a (Maybe) Retired Pastor

Tag: politics

  • A New Prime Minister

    mayberetiredpastor

    A New Prime Minister

    Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.

    Winston Churchill 1947 (1)

    … there is no authority except from God, and those authorities that exist have been instituted by God.

    Letter to the Romans 13:1 New Testament, The Bible

    The UK has a new Prime Minister. The appointment of Andy Burnham as Prime Minister has been unusual for recent parliaments because he did not enter office as the result of a General Election or, indeed, by an election of Labour Party (the party holding the majority in Parliament) members. He was elected unopposed as leader of the Labour Party by Labour MPs only. There has been considerable comment that he should submit himself to a General Election to obtain a mandate so that his premiership can be legitimised. Such arguments have been put by opposition parties, members of the public and, even, by seasoned political commentators. Whilst it is a viewpoint that could be held it is, to my mind, a mistaken understanding of our constitutional procedures.

    When I was taught basic constitutional theory at school, it was made very clear that we do not have a presidential system of democracy where supreme executive power is conferred via direct popular vote. We have a representative form of parliamentary democracy. We elect individual members of parliament who are our representatives and, crucially, not our delegates. They do not arrive in Parliament bound by a set of instructions given to them by the people who voted for them. Instead, as our representatives, they are expected to exercise their individual judgement on the various matters presented to them as members of parliament. One of those matters is the appointment of the government including the Prime Minister. Sir Keir Starmer had to step down as Prime Minister precisely because  he had lost the support of the Labour MP’s. Andy Burnham is Prime Minister because he has the overwhelming support of the Labour MP’s. His personal mandate is the same as every MP and every minister in government, it is from the parliamentary constituency which he represents. In his case, he was given a remarkable overall majority in a by-election turnout that was higher than in the last two general elections (2). Andy Burnham’s mandate is, indeed, stronger than many of his colleagues.  

    Democracy comes in many forms. It is unfortunate, that, for many people, the American form of presidential democracy is considered the norm. This has resulted in the steady transformation of UK governance from a collective, where the Prime Minister is merely the “first amongst equals”, to a presidency where the Prime Minister controls and dictates to the other members of the government. Charisma (or the lack of it) and power have come to replace collective wisdom. Winston Churchill’s 1947 quote above is a reminder that democracy is merely the best of a bad bunch and is subject to many weaknesses. The present American administration is the clearest example of one democratic system’s weaknesses.

    1. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1947/nov/11/parliament-bill PARLIAMENT BILL HC Deb 11 November 1947 vol 444 cc203-321 acc. 21.07.2026 13:00
    2. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/what-turnout-makerfield-election-34145624 acc. 21.07.2026 14:51

  • Where’s The Outrage?

    mayberetiredpastor

    Where’s The Outrage? – Reform’s Accidental Recruiter!

    To make an apt answer is a joy to anyone,
        and a word in season, how good it is!

    The Book of Proverbs 15:23, Old Testament, The Bible.

    The appalling performance of the Labour Party in the recent local elections in England  has resulted in a serious challenge to the Prime Minister’s leadership (1). The overwhelming message from voters during the local elections was that the Labour Party had been given a huge majority in the general election in order to bring about radical change. But, instead of radical change, what the country saw was just more of the same. And the blame was pinned clearly and solely on the Prime Minister. Consequently, there is now a leadership contest in progress (albeit with glacial slowness but soon to gather speed).

    Amidst all the commentary and analysis, one aspect of Keir Starmer’s (the Prime Minister) leadership since taking over the party leadership that has not received much comment is his clear bias (I believe unintentional) in favour of the Jewish community. His outrage and anger against any antisemitic activity is clear and public. But when it comes to other communities he is strangely subdued if not silent. Most conspicuously, of course, during the war against Gaza the very cautious criticism of Israel’s actions seemed ludicrously out-of-step with the enormity of the suffering being inflicted at will by Israel. One felt that, David Lammy, as the Foreign Secretary, was chafing at the bit in parliament, longing to go much further in his criticism yet constrained by his office and the Prime Minister.

    Because he is the Prime Minister, this bias has significant consequential  effects in the country. The running political story of this parliament has been the rise of Reform. Reform follows an ancient  path to achieving political success. By focussing on dissatisfaction and anxiety in the country and offering a simple scapegoat it draws large numbers of people. Fundamentally, Reform divides the country into “them” and “us”. Inevitably, this provides a forum for racist tinged thinking, and, sometimes, explicit racist comment.  What one looks for from the government of the day, is a counter-narrative that unites rather than divides. Unfortunately, Keir Starmer’s bias serves only to divide the nation further, not only through his personal comments but through the policy actions taken by his government.

    Strong condemnation of antisemitism is right and appropriate, but so is condemnation of Islamophobia. Keir Starmer’s consistent failure to condemn rising Islamophobia with the same vigour and outrage as he does antisemitism divides the nation as corrosively as Reform’s “them” and “us” populism.  The proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation by the Home Secretary at the time when Israel was visibly intent on destroying all Gaza will only be read in one way by those who watch with horror the destruction of Muslim lives. One journalist (2) has written of Keir Starmer’s “tin ear”. The terrible irony is that his tin ear can lead only to more acts of antisemitism and greater division within society. He is Reform’s great, accidental recruiter!

    1. English Local Council elections are similar to US mid-terms in so far as they provide an opportunity for the electorate to express their evaluation of the current government’s performance.

    2. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/apr/13/keir-starmer-uk-china-menu-prime-minister-beijing?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

  • A New World Order

    mayberetiredpastor

    A New World Order

    … for all who take the sword will perish by the sword.

    Matthew 26:52 New Testament, The Bible

    On the last day of February, President Trump unceremoniously demonstrated the existence of a new world order. The previous rules-based order of international law which he had been progressively undermining was comprehensively shredded by his unannounced war on Iran. The frequently noted vagueness and shifting explanations given by Trump and senior members of his administration give the lie away that  there is any ethical or legal justification for the attacks on Iran. There is none. The only thing that mattered was that he could do it and what others may have thought or what some abstract notion of law might declare were of no consequence. Trump has driven the world into a place where the only thing that matters is, do I have the power to do it? If I do, then why not? The only thing that matters now is might.  

    It is not only in the sphere of international politics that he has radically undermined law and rule, he has demonstrated the same attitude domestically. The operation of ICE and the ethos underpinning it shows the same willingness to ignore the law and tear-up the rule book. Court rulings are treated with disdain and Congress is simply ignored. Lip-service is paid to the carefully constructed checks and balances of the American constitution.

    The rewriting of world order in this way opens up the way for other powerful actors to act as they wish with little or no restraint. The present government of Israel clearly feels it is now free to exercise its own military strength to achieve long held objectives of the Zionist far right. It seems almost certain that Israel will annexe the West Bank, and greatly expand its borders both to the north and to the west. Taiwan must be regarding the new order with nervousness as it wonders if China will similarly decide to “re-unite” China.  We should not be surprised if, in the next few years, we see radically redrawn borders across the world.

    Jesus famously rebuked the disciples when one used his sword to cut-off the High Priest’s servant’s ear during Jesus’ arrest that fateful night before Good Friday. He warned them that to choose to live by the sword is to choose to die by it. The world has been thrust into a new order where the only rule is might. Rather than greater security there will be less. Israel has become adept at assassination with little regard for the cost in innocent human lives. The US has given its imprimatur to Putin’s strong-man world view and nations are racing to arm themselves with independent nuclear weapons. Nation will eye nation with armed suspicion. The poor and weak will suffer and orphans of war will multiply across the nations and the number of displaced persons will continue to escalate.

    Is there any hope for future generations? Holy Week reassures us that this state of affairs will not last forever, that it is temporary, and that God will bring about a new order where might is not right but justice will flow like rolling waters. Every knee will bow before Christ and every tear will be wiped away (1). The times of disorder will not be allowed to continue and rulers will be brought to account. Meanwhile, the ambassadors of Christ must continue to work to protect the weak and the poor.

    1. Philippians 2:10,11, Revelation 21:4, New Testament, The Bible.

  • Is The UK State Biased Against Palestine?

    mayberetiredpastor

    Is The UK State Biased Against Palestine?

    You shall not render an unjust judgement; you shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great: with justice you shall judge your neighbour.

    Leviticus 19:15. Old Testament, The Bible

    The reactions of the Home Secretary (Yvette Cooper), the Prime Minister and the BBC Governors to the Gaza-related protests by Palestine Action and Bob Vylan give cause for concern. Palestine Action made the headlines by successfully breaking into an RAF Airbase and spray-painting  an Hercules aircraft engine. Yvette Cooper’s reaction was to immediately proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation (1). Shortly after, Bob Vylan, during his set at Glastonbury Festival, led the audience in chants denouncing the Israel Defence Force, an act that the Prime Minister then denounced publicly as “appalling hate speech” (2) and which led to furore in the BBC with the result that the video was removed from the BBC iPlayer and a number of senior staff suspended (3).

    As a protest group, Palestine Action appears to have conducted several high profile acts of vandalism against a number of companies and establishments whose activities they feel support the Israeli war in Gaza. Their purpose appears to be to push the UK government into reducing support of Israel’s military. They have apparently cost some companies large amounts of money to repair the damage done.   On this last occasion they have succeeded in seriously embarrassing the government and the RAF. But does this warrant their proscription as a terrorist organisation? Surely the criminal law is sufficient to address serious damage without proscribing it as terrorist activity? It does seem that their activities as a protest group have been just too effective for the government (and perhaps the targets) to stomach and so the Home Secretary has chosen to define them as a terrorist group to silence them.

    As many have pointed out (see e.g. 4), Bob Vylan’s words must be set alongside the actual deeds of the IDF  in Gaza where appalling acts, if not actual war crimes, have clearly been committed and continue to be committed on a daily basis and yet the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary remain questionably muted about the latter while full of righteous indignation concerning the former and Palestine Action. Where is the impartiality and balance?

    It is difficult to escape the suspicion that our government institutions are infected by an entrenched bias towards Israel and against Gaza and Palestine. One wishes, as many do I’m sure, for a more genuinely even-handed, and courageous government, unafraid of the power of others – whether great or small. The Prime Minister, self-confessedly is not a person of religious faith, but I assure him that he does and will stand before a Judge who will hold great and small to account.    

    1. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2025-06-23/debates/25062337000014/PalestineActionProscription   acc. 13.7.25 14:18
    2. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c33514nryy1o   acc. 13.7.25 14:35
    3. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czjkmlj1348o   acc. 13.7.25 14:53
    4. https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1BA75C8hAu/ 

  • Hostile Environment

    mayberetiredpastor

    Hostile Environment

    5 For this very reason, you must make every effort to support your faith with goodness, and goodness with knowledge, 6 and knowledge with self-control, and self-control with endurance, and endurance with godliness, 7 and godliness with mutual affection, and mutual affection with love.

    2 Peter 1:5-7 New Testament, The Bible

    Recently, BBC News ran an article highlighting the struggles some people have had to prove their British citizenship even though they had lived in the UK all their lives and their parents were British Citizens (1). One man was happily employed in a well-paying job but on applying for his passport for a trip abroad he was suddenly told he was not a citizen and had no right to live and work in the UK. His employer had no choice but to sack him and he spent years in the wilderness having no official status, becoming homeless and severely depressed. It has taken years for his citizenship to be acknowledged and he has been left still traumatised by his experience. Other examples were given. Despite all the fanfare surrounding the “Windrush Generation” and how the Home Office would put right the unfairness suffered by that generation, their children and others still suffer. They suffer because of the “hostile environment” culture put in place at the Home Office by the then Home Secretary, and subsequently Prime Minister, Theresa May. The “hostile environment” means that instead of assisting applicants to determine their status the Home Office makes it as difficult as possible in the hope that people will give-up and leave the UK so “helping” to make the immigration numbers look “better”.

    The Bible passage quoted above would be familiar to most Christians who would generally seek to apply them to their lives as individual human beings. This is good as far as it goes, but the message of the gospel means that virtues such as these are not intended to be confined to a person’s private, religious life. They are intended to spill out of the individual and to shape society. Consequently, Christians seek to shape society so that it exhibits goodness, knowledge, love etc. The Bible is perfectly clear about the treatment of foreigners and immigrants. God defends their cause and we are to love them (Deuteronomy 10:17-19, Old Testament, The Bible).

    Theresa May is well-known as the daughter of a Church of England minister and has publicly stated that she is a Christian (2). It is difficult to understand, then, how she could have thought it was godly and Christian deliberately to develop a culture of hostility in the Home Office. We often bemoan the state of our society and the world in general, but if Christians, particularly those with worldly influence, ignore or refuse to seek to embed the virtues of the Bible into our culture and do the exact opposite we have no right to complain.

    We must not confuse virtues with issues. Issues are the matters of policy – gay marriage, assisted dying, immigration etc. – virtues are about the kind of society we want to be, it’s fundamental culture – goodness, gentleness, mercy, honesty etc. Christians may differ and divide over issues but about virtues we should be of one mind and heart.

    Christians say they desire to see God’s Kingdom come. When we  support or even promote a culture antithetical to biblical virtues we work against the Kingdom and betray our King.

    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theresa_May
    2. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93lzl1vpeqo

  • Not A Matter Of Right And Wrong

    mayberetiredpastor

    Not A Matter Of Right And Wrong

    12 the night is far gone, the day is near. Let us then lay aside the works of darkness and put on the armour of light; 13 let us live honourably as in the day, not in revelling and drunkenness, not in debauchery and licentiousness, not in quarrelling and jealousy. 14 Instead, put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.

    Romans 13:12-14, New Testament, The Bible.

    Off the cuff remarks can be dangerous. We inadvertently say things we would never dream of saying in a more considered manner. These “Freudian slips” can also reveal deep, unsettling truths about ourselves or about our view of the world. Last week, the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, made an off the cuff remark in response to a reporter’s question. He said  that “it is no longer a matter of right and wrong”. I confess that I have forgotten whether the context was the uproar concerning the so-called “loop-hole” exploited by a Palestinian family to gain entry to the UK or the aftermath of the White House ambush of President Zelensky.  But, the remark stands out as a deeply revealing comment about the state of our world at the present time. Right and wrong no longer have any role in the international relationships of our world. President Trump’s State of the Union address made clear what matters: “America will be rich again!” was his triumphant cry which was greeted with huge applause and cheering from the majority benches.  

    So many biblical texts spring to mind in response to such a declaration (the parable of the rich fool Luke, 12:13-21; serving God and Mammon, Matthew 6:24; the root of all evil, 1 Timothy 6:10, to name but three) that it seems unnecessary to state how unbiblical and anti-Christian such a world is. Except that so many apparently professing Christians appear to be in complete agreement with such sentiment. The world is in a very dark place.

    Last time, I wrote that Christians need to speak the light of truth in the darkness, so, the Palestinian family did not exploit a loophole but followed Home Office procedure to the letter and fully within the law (1); President Zelensky is not a dictator and did not start the war.   But truth is more than words. It is also about how we live our lives. Our daily acts that demonstrate who we are following and which reveal the light of a different Kingdom ruled by different laws: not bowing to Mammon, the god of wealth; welcoming the outcast and stranger; treating others as we would want to be treated; receiving and giving grace; serving one another and not grasping for ourselves.

    It is the season of Lent, the period of fasting in the church calendar before the celebration of Easter. The true fast that God desires is the breaking of injustice, the releasing of the oppressed, the breaking of every bondage, the sharing with the poor and hungry,  homing the homeless and clothing the naked (Isaiah 58:6-7). Every small act that contributes to these pushes back against the darkness that is enfolding us.

    1. https://www.declassifieduk.org/rights-and-wrongs-over-gaza-judgment-exposes-starmer/

  • Judgement Comes

    mayberetiredpastor

    Judgement Comes

    13 For from the least to the greatest of them, everyone is greedy for unjust gain; and from prophet to priest, everyone deals falsely. 14 They have treated the wound of my people carelessly, saying, ‘Peace, peace’, when there is no peace. 15 They acted shamefully, they committed abomination; yet they were not ashamed, they did not know how to blush. Therefore they shall fall among those who fall; at the time that I punish them, they shall be overthrown, says the Lord.

    Jeremiah 6:13-15, Old Testament, The Bible

    37 Let your word be “Yes, Yes” or “No, No”; anything more than this comes from the evil one.

    Matthew 5:37, New Testament, The Bible.

    Apart from a few initial expressions of outrage and astonishment there seems to be little continuing outrage expressed at President Trump’s proposals for Gaza. Although many do object and deride the proposals it is in terms of what is practical and possible. The proposal to remove all the Palestinians from Gaza and turn it into a playground for the rich is being given legitimacy. Gone is the language of “ethnic cleansing”. Yet, this would be the clearest example of ethnic cleansing since World War II and it would be perpetrated by an American President with the agreement and delight of a Jewish Prime Minister and his government.  There seems to be an awful irony here.

    It gives us a clear insight into the moral framework of Trump and his administration: the world is seen entirely through the lens of the real estate developer and a rather shady one at that! Everything is up for grabs to the one who has enough market muscle to make it their own. Hence, Putin will have his way and annexe a huge portion of Eastern Ukraine and Ukraine will have no say in the matter, in fact, Ukraine will have to give up its mineral wealth to the US as well or face obliteration!

    Returning to Gaza, it is noticeable that the proposal for removing the Palestinians does not include an offer by the US to give refuge in the US, rather they are to be taken-in by Egypt and Jordan. Thankfully, Egypt and Jordan have refused to take part in this charade.

    With the ascendancy of Trump we have truly entered into a great moral darkness. It is more important than ever that truth be spoken so that the light can shine in the darkness. The proposal to remove all the Palestinians from Gaza must be named and condemned for what it is – ethnic cleansing – and it must not be sanitised and legitimised by describing it as anything else. There is a judgement that is coming and it will not deal lightly with those who oppress the widow and the orphan or who teach that good is bad and bad is good.

  • The Strongest Democracy?

    mayberetiredpastor

    The Strongest Democracy?

    First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings should be made for everyone, for kings and all who are in high positions, so that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and dignity.

    1 Timothy 2:1-2 New Testament, The Bible

    We have been in the US since the beginning of the January on grandparent duties. Consequently, we have had a ringside seat as President Trump began his second term as president. It has been like watching a horror show – deeply disturbing yet fascinating at the same time! He has already done many things that have left us open-mouthed,  but the  most disturbing was the very first thing he did on taking office: the pardoning of those who had been convicted and sentenced for their actions in the January 6th attack on the Capitol building at the beginning of Biden’s presidency.

    I was astonished to realise that an American President apparently has untrammelled powers of pardon. Previously, I had assumed there were strict conditions on who could be pardoned and that this only happened rarely. But President Trump in an unceremonious flaunting of untrammelled power set aside mass convictions and sentences that had been imposed after due process of law. What we see here is the unravelling of the rule of law. The law is not perfect but it ensures that everyone is held equally accountable (in principle) before it. This was severely undermined by the Supreme Court ruling that a president cannot be held legally accountable for actions taken in the capacity of president and now, Trump, by overturning convictions he doesn’t like, has made the law subject to the personal whims of the president and there is nothing that can be done about it.

    This seems to me to be a major turning point in American democracy. Americans have delighted in boasting about the strength of their model of democracy. But now we see that, at its core, it is weak and, perhaps, now is crippled. Unspoken convention has been the thing that has held American democracy together, but now there is a president who pays no heed to unspoken convention and who is supported by a Congress that likewise has abandoned convention. The consequence is the crumbling of democratic rule. In it’s place we have the rule of a dictator – although I suspect Trump would prefer the title “King”. Which is ironic given the history of the US.

    Christians are commanded to pray for kings, governors and governments. This is sometimes read as simply praying for the well-being of the ruler(s). It is, in fact, a holding to account of all human rule. We ask that they be held to account and conformed to the standard of the heavenly court. Certainly, this is a time for prayer for Americans.

  • Ancient Economics For Modern Times

    mayberetiredpastor

    Ancient Economics For Modern Times

    6 This is what the Lord commands concerning the daughters of Zelophehad, “Let them marry whom they think best; only it must be into a clan of their father’s tribe that they are married, 7 so that no inheritance of the Israelites shall be transferred from one tribe to another; for all Israelites shall retain the inheritance of their ancestral tribes.

    Numbers 36:6, The Bible, Old Testament

    So, at last, we have a half-way sensible budget! Last week, the UK Chancellor delivered her first budget. Thankfully, the neo-liberal rhetoric of the general election was just that – rhetoric. What was actually served on budget day was a clear expression of traditional Labour values. Half-way sensible because General Election promises has meant the Chancellor resorting to raising employer national insurance contributions – a maybe dubious move. But, at least there was a return to common-sense economics – you get what you pay for! Someone has to pay in order to restore public services to good health and for investment in the economy. The new government has decided that it should be businesses.

    What the Chancellor’s first budget demonstrates is that the economy of a society is determined by the ethical framework that is applied. The social ethics of the Bible as expressed in the law of the Jubilee (1) are usually considered irrelevant and unworkable in a modern capitalist society but the underlying principles are, in fact, directly applicable. As encapsulated in the biblical quotation above the gift of the Promised Land is for the people of Israel – not just a ruling elite. It insists that every family possesses an inalienable right to their own parcel of land.

    What we see here is the delineation of society’s stakeholders as the people. The social ethics of the Bible lay down the principle that each and every stakeholder in society should have the same inalienable right to the economic resources necessary to support themselves and to flourish. In modern economies land is not the basic resource we use to measure and allocate economic resource that role is taken by money. Applying this fundamental biblical principle thus means that every individual should possess appropriate financial resources to support themselves and to build their lives. The idea of a universal basic income/universal basic wage sometimes discussed amongst economists is thus not so far-fetched if you are keen on seeing biblical principles applied in modern society. This is the idea that every adult receives out of general taxation, as a right, an income that would enable them to live at a minimum standard.

    Many Christians when first encountering this notion feel that this is something for nothing and a recipe for laziness. But this is exactly what it was in the Bible – inalienable land by right for nothing! But they still had to work their land wisely. In the same way, people receiving a universal basic income could choose to do nothing, but to prosper and be fruitful they have to work and use their basic income wisely. For the state, the advantages seem numerous: welfare support, welfare benefits, state pensions etc. all  become unnecessary. Administration of a universal benefit is simple and inexpensive (no need to means test or assess eligibility). Taxation becomes simple as all earned income  can be taxed directly at some appropriate level without the exemptions and allowances that bedevil most taxation systems and which create cliff-edges when benefits/exemptions are removed/reduced as earned income increases.  People would still be able to prosper and, for some, become rich, but inheritance tax (the year of the Jubilee) will ensure that excessive wealth accumulated by individuals is returned to the wider economy and thus to every stakeholder.

    The law of the Jubilee and its underlying ethical principles might have been originally decreed for an ancient agrarian society, but they can be applied directly to great benefit to modern society. For Christians this must surely be a good thing.

    1. The Most Hated Tax, Diary of a Maybe Retired Pastor, 25.10.2024

  • The Most Hated Tax

    mayberetiredpastor

    The Most Hated Tax

    25 If anyone of your kin falls into difficulty and sells a piece of property, then the next-of-kin shall come and redeem what the relative has sold ….  28 But if there are not sufficient means to recover it, what was sold shall remain with the purchaser until the year of jubilee; in the jubilee it shall be released, and the property shall be returned.

    Leviticus 25;25-28 The Old Testament

    The most hated tax in the UK is, it seems, inheritance tax (or, estate duty). This is the tax paid on the inheritance passed on by parents to their children. The success of the right wing media in embedding this antipathy amongst the general population is impressive and rests on the narrative that the inheritance we pass on is the result of the hard work of the parents over their working lives. It’s their property. It feels like legalised robbery. What is never emphasised is that the majority of people will not have to pay any inheritance tax because no tax is payable below £325,000 (or £500,000 if you pass your home on to your children). Only those who have more than this when they die will have to pay any tax. The majority of people do not have this kind inheritance to pass on. What is also never said is that inheritance tax is one of the most effective ways in ensuring that extreme wealth is released into the wider economy rather than being hoarded by a small minority. It is the reason why the power and privilege of the aristocracy was broken in the last century thus enabling general living standards to rise and promoting a more equal society.

    The year of the Jubilee (referenced above) is usually treated as an interesting but obscure provision in the Bible for the ancient people of Israel. Every 50 years, any land purchased had to be returned in its entirety to the original owners. Wealth accumulated by the minority could not be held in perpetuity and passed on to their descendants – it had to be redistributed back to the people. It was, in essence, a 100% inheritance tax! The wealth of the land was to be equally shared so that every Israelite had the opportunity to prosper.

    By and large, Christians are just as antipathetic to tax, inheritance tax in particular, as the general population. But the law of the Jubilee challenges that antipathy. If you are a Christian who professes to take the Bible seriously, and believes that its provisions are relevant to today’s society, then the law of the Jubilee should give you pause for thought: Should you reevaluate your antipathy towards inheritance tax?   It is not simply an effective tax it is a divinely ordained tax and its presence as part of our taxation system should be welcomed as an example of kingdom ethics at work in our modern society.

    The Jubilee law is part of the Holiness Code in Leviticus. It begins with the call to be holy because God is holy (1). Christians are called to reflect God’s character not only in their personal lives but also in the society that they build. The UK Chancellor will very shortly present the first budget of the new government. It is widely anticipated that changes to inheritance tax to raise more income to fund essential public services will be included. How will Christians respond? Will we raise our voices in complaint at more taxes and threaten to leave the country, or will we welcome the alignment of public policy with biblical values and the greater reflection of God’s character in society?

    1. Leviticus 19:1-2